Tuesday, October 6, 2015

Minutes of September 21, 2015

Bristol Community College
Faculty & Professional Staff Senate Meeting
Minutes of Monday, September 21, 2015
Room H129 3:15pm

Senators in attendance:  M. Geary, J. Pelletier, R. Benya-Soderbom, D. St. George, S. Pero, R. Worthington, S. McCourt, J. Boulay, S. Ferreira, J. Flanigan, L. Neubert, H. Tinberg, R. Amarasingham, K. Hiller, T. Grady, L. Delano-Botelho, J. Corven, B. French
Absences: C. Leonard, J. Mbugua, J. Constantine, D. Phillips, J. Jodoin
Excused Absences: G. Leeman
Four guests attended this meeting.
Meeting called to order:  3:16 pm
Minutes:  Minutes from September 3rd were reviewed and approved with no abstentions.
Division Reports
·         Division 1: Getting to know new dean; large division; rumors of reorganization
·         Division 2: Getting to know new dean; eye on gen ed task force
·         Division 3: No updates
·         Division 4: looking for healthcare info management program director and instructor, dental hygiene working on self-study due in fall; clinical lab science is having accreditation visit
·         Division 5: discussion of new academic programs to BHE (e.g., life sciences); middle school visit; increase undergraduate research opportunities; planetarium programs; accessibility of services at other campuses
·         Division 6: No updates
·         Other Divisions: No updates
Senate’s Strategic Goals for AY 2015-2016
The strategic goals for the academic year 2015-2016 were reviewed and approved with no abstentions by the Senate.
·         Governance:
o    Senate President Tinberg and Secretary Boulay have begun meeting with BCC President Sbrega and Chief Academic Officer Sethares on a monthly basis.
o    The Executive Committee has been invited to attend the full Vice President Council (VPC) meetings.
o    The General Education Task Force will utilize the Academic Initiative joint governance document (the form may also be used for a new Title III grant to foster inclusion from all sectors).
o    The Senate will vote on changes to by-laws and provide input to NEASC groups.
·         Sustainability:
o    A nominations committee will be formed and new Senators will be mentored.
o    A question was raised whether Senate membership satisfies committee membership (like MACER does).
§  Division 4 treats Senate membership as fulfilling committee work and Senators have the opportunity for monthly reporting at division meetings (visibility and inclusiveness of governance).
§  Senators noted the importance of preserving independence and some concerns were raised over being viewed as a committee for college service.
·         Student retention & support:
o    An ad hoc task force with clear timeline will be formed, consisting of Senators and constituents. They will be charged with creating a data report on student retention and support to be shared with college.
o    A spring summit on academic support and retention will also be planned.
General Education Competencies
·         The task force will hold their first meeting on September 24, 2015; they will discuss the charge, established timeline, and committee makeup.
·         Five Senators are represented on the 17 member group and Secretary Boulay will co-chair it with Holly Pappas.
·         The Academic Initiative joint governance document will be piloted by the task force and information will be shared publicly.
·         A discussion followed regarding the importance of faculty-driven outcomes assessment; questions were raised about the impetus for creating this group and whether it was a reaction to NEASC.
NEASC Working Groups
Questions were raised about the status of the NEASC working groups.
·         Senators indicated that none of the working groups received notice of upcoming meetings for this academic year.
·         Senators on the governance group questioned whether they would oversee the new academic initiative process.
·         Senators on the outcomes assessment group weren’t sure whether their charge was fulfilled by making recommendations to form a general education task force.
·         The advising group met twice in spring, but are not sure how new dean advising will impact their charge; the meeting focus consisted of eliminating paperwork during advising and having students meet with the same advisor.
As a result, the Senate will request update on working groups’ charge, accomplishments, and status to send to constituents so it is clear to the entire college community.
Proposed Changes to By-Laws
·         Senate will vote on by-laws at next meeting; quorum is needed.
·         The Senate will explore electronic voting via Office 365 (Central Committee discussed requiring committees to submit electronic minutes to share with community).
·         An amendment will need to be added to the proposed by-laws to reflect representation of Advising in reorganization to Academic Affairs.
Other
·         Senators expressed concern over the number of full-time faculty positions that have not been replaced from last year and the limited office space for full-time faculty who are teaching at other campuses (e.g., New Bedford, Attleboro, Taunton).
·         A discussion about student and faculty equity followed: including the use of contingent labor, the impact of course cancellations due to low enrollment, the feasibility for students to complete programs of study at any BCC campus (e.g., integrity of programs and access to resources for satellite campuses) and how this information is communicated to students.

Meeting Adjourned:  4:16 pm
Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Boulay, BCC Faculty & Professional Staff Secretary





Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Minutes of September 3, 2015

Bristol Community College
Faculty & Professional Staff Senate Meeting
Minutes of Thursday, September 3, 2015
Room H129 3:15pm

Senators in attendance:  M. Geary, J. Pelletier, R. Benya-Soderbom, B. French, D. St. George, S. Pero, J. Constantine, R. Worthington, S. McCourt, J. Boulay, S. Ferreira, J. Flanigan, D. Phillips, L. Neubert, J. Jodoin, H. Tinberg
Absences: C. Leonard, J. Corven, J. Mbugua, R. Amarasingham, K. Hiller, L. Delano-Botelho, T. Grady
Excused Absences: G. Leeman
Two guests attended this meeting.

Meeting called to order:  3:40 pm; quorum 3:52 pm

Minutes:  Minutes from February 23rd , March 9th, April 13th, were reviewed and approved with no abstentions.

Moment of Silence
The Senate had a moment of silence in honor of the passing of fellow Senator Sally Gabb.

Senate’s Strategic Goals for AY 2015-2016
President Tinberg discussed the annual goals, which resulted from the Senate retreat during the summer.

·         Governance: implement the joint academic initiative document; revise By-Laws and vote on them 4 weeks following; report on NEAS work groups; vote on strategic plan at next meeting
·         Sustainability: organize a Senate Nominations Committee and improve attendance at meetings
·         Student Retention/Academic Support: organize an ad hoc retention committee to complete a written report by April 1, 2016; plan a retention summit to be guided by data

Discussions followed regarding recruiting and mentoring new Senators, using Office 365 to increase Senate engagement, greater transparency regarding changes to the academic calendar, and engaging adjunct faculty on the NEASC Governance group.

Proposed Changes to By-Laws
·         Division representation: Because the college’s reorganization of some areas impacted Senate representation (constituent census was conducted by Senators Leeman, Boulay, and Worthington in Spring 2015), proposed changes will reorganize division representation on Senate (e.g., “Division 7” will now be broken out to Enrollment Services, Student Services, and Lash Division) in order to expand representation of constituencies.
·         Article 3 Ad Hoc Committees: created for the length of 1 year and reconstituted as needed (e.g., Grandchamp Committee)
·         Voting: if quorum not present, explore electronic voting
·         Glossary: revise to outline representation of areas
·         Voting on revised By-Laws will occur after 4 weeks

General Education Competencies
·         Senator Boulay and Holly Pappas were tasked with co-chairing a task force that will provide recommendations on BCC general education competencies to Academic Affairs by December 2015. The opening day panel discussion focused on this topic and competency meetings that explored aligning existing general education competencies with AAC&U LEAP Rubrics. Overall, the sentiment was that it was a valuable exercise to explore the assessment of general education competencies and the following points were raised by Senators:
o    The importance of the Senate engaging in dialogue; Senators were encouraged to sign up for the task force
o    Understanding the glossary of terms
o    Purpose is to not tie hands of instructors, but opportunity for communication to students
o    Need for transparency and engaging diverse stakeholders
o    Importance of alignment with courses
o    Where are notes on conversation from 8 years ago?
o    Importance of including both historical context and new perspectives from newer colleagues in discussions
o    Do we have too many competencies or do other colleges have too few?
o    Are existing competencies (or LEAP Rubrics) too cumbersome?
o    Can it be personalized—will students have alternate ways for demonstrating competencies outside of courses?
o    Opportunity to modernize our competencies

Meeting Adjourned:  4:31 pm
Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Boulay, BCC Faculty & Professional Staff Secretary


Thursday, September 3, 2015

Minutes of April 13, 2015

Bristol Community College
Faculty & Professional Staff Senate Meeting
Minutes of Monday April 13, 2015
B101 3:15 p.m.
Senators in attendance: J. Pelletier M. Geary, J. Corven, J. Mbugua, S. McCourt, J. Boulay, D. St. George, R. Amarasingham, C. Poore-Pariseau, S. Gabb, R. Benya-Soderbom, E. Kemper-French, S. Ferreira, R. Worthington, H. Tinberg, G. Leeman, J. Constantine
Excused Absences: K. Hiller, T. Grady
Absences:  R. Santos, D. Warr, J. Duponte,  G. Heaney, M. Williams, L Delano-Botelho, C. Leonard,  S. Pero
Guests: 6

Meeting called to order 3:21 pm.

Minutes: Minutes from March 9, 2015 were reviewed, but not voted on because quorum was not met.

Division Updates:
·       Division 1: The search for division dean is about to be finalized.
·       Division 2: Finalist interviews for division dean are being finalized; one candidate withdrew.
·       Division 3: No updates.
·       Division 4: No update. 4/22 bone marrow drive.
·       Division 5: No update. Eighteen Honors Scholars are going to UMass Amherst; the Honors Showcase is scheduled for 4/29.
·       Division 6: No update.
·       Division 7: One Dean of Advising candidate withdrew.

Senate Elections
Title III Updates
§  Nominations for the Writing in the Disciplines Drafting Group: Greg Sethares solicited nominations. Participants were asked to commit to 100 hours of work. While the committee is not fully formed yet, concerns were raised about the composition of the group—direct reports may feel unable to speak freely with their supervisors present.  Multidisciplinary representation and more full-time faculty are needed on the committee.
§  Thinking About Process: At the Professional Staff meeting, Greg Sethares and Jennifer Menard discussed scope range, purpose, suggestions for activities, synthesizing constituent emails. A discussion followed about the importance of ongoing consultations with stakeholders and documentation of findings. This initiative presents a strong opportunity to utilize the joint initiative document.
Update on Governance
§  Report from the NEASC Working Groups:
§  The governance group will look at self-study findings. Unclear charge.
§  The advising group convened once; the task is to identify a comprehensive and effective system of advising. There was some disagreement among the chairs about whether the past task force on advising’s recommendations were met. Only two faculty members serve on this group. Most issues raised were academic in nature (e.g., problems with courses).
·       Latest on Advisement Reorganization: Research finds that most advising centers in country reside in Academic Affairs. A discussion followed about the purpose of advising (enrollment vs. as an extension of the curriculum). Synergy between advisors and faculty will allow for better student support. Steve Viveiros suggested a division liaison approach. When asked to generate pros and cons of moving from Enrollment, advisors indicated that they wanted to move to Academic Affairs. Some faculty and professional staff felt they didn’t have sufficient expertise to respond to this projected move.

Meeting adjourned 4:10 p.m.

Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Boulay, BCC Faculty & Professional Staff Secretary




Minutes of March 9, 2015

Bristol Community College
Faculty & Professional Staff Senate Meeting
Minutes of Monday, March 9, 2015
Room B101 3:15pm

Senators in attendance:  M. Geary, J. Pelletier, R. Benya-Soderbom, J. Mbugua, R. Amarasingham, C. Poore-Pariseau, B. French, L. Delano-Botelho, D. St. George, K. Hiller, S. Pero and G. Leeman
Excused absences: Robyn Worthington, Susan McCourt, Jenn Boulay and Tom Grady
Absences:  J. Constantine, D. Warr, S. Gabb, M. Williams, C. Leonard, J. Corvin, R. Santos, J. Duponte,  G. Heaney, S. Gabb
Special Guest:  Sarah Morrell
Guests:  7
Meeting called to order:  3:17 pm
Minutes:  Minutes from February 23, 2015 were reviewed, but not voted on because quorum was not met.
Reporting from the Divisions:   Division 2 is getting closer to having a new dean with no firm timeline.  Division 1 interviews for a new dean will be held after spring break.  Division 4’s accreditation is up for renewal.  They are working with administration to finalize the process.  Division 5 reported possible instructional issues/academic support with labs moving from E bldg. to the new science building. No input from the remaining divisions. 
Nominations:  a call was made to notify the Senate of any new nominations for the upcoming elections.
Dual Enrollment & Early College:  Much discussion took place regarding age criteria. As defined by the State, Dual Enrollment students are typically 16 yrs of age and still in high school.  Below 16 is underage.  The numbers provided (by Sarah Morell)  for students registered in the Fall and Spring are as follows:
 Fall 2014 
 49 students were registered under the age of 16 at the start of the term
15 students of the 49 were homeschooled students
Spring 2015
 93 students were registered under the age of 16 at the start of the term
11 students of the 93 were homeschooled students
Other points made:
-Discussion regarding some students take BCC courses for free, but homeschool and underage do not necessarily take courses for free-
-focus to strengthen the attendance for meetings between Durfee and BCC as Durfee has had less attendance
-Mandate needed from the Superintendent to enhance Dual Enrollment to BCC standards and that Durfee put in more effort with the Dual Enrollment process and not rely on faculty to drive the agenda.
-The possibility of BCC/Durfee sharing a google drive for information.
-Develop a common language between the two schools regarding definition of what our courses are.
-Strengthen the eligibility process for students
-Updates to the Senate regarding changes in policy
-A question came up about why some faculty are not getting letters regarding underage enrollment.  There is a glitch in the system which is not capturing students who turn 16 and no longer underage.
-Recruiting more first generation students/underrepresented groups who meet criteria.

Title III:  A concern was raised regarding the process of how ideas of how to use funds.  There seems to be a “tag” on certain ideas that seem to be permanent ideas.  Perhaps more open forums before final decisions are made.  The timeline seems to have gone by so fast.

NEASC working groups:  Outcomes has met.  Advisement will hold their first meeting on April 8th.  NEASC seems to be vague on the criteria that Governance should have.

Advising and Orientation move to Academic Affairs:  Senate will send a response to constituents regarding more input needed to this initiative. This is a transparency/governance issue and the Senate’s pilot for our agreement with Administration regarding transparency and shared governance.  Questions were raised as to what the rationale and clear benefits are for this transition.
-Although this initiative was on the All-College Meeting Agenda, it was not discussed as the meeting went into overtime.
-Previous to this new initiative, the Leaning Commons stakeholders were not involved
-A question was raised – does Advising adhere to the College’s mission?
-Advising is an academic issue and belongs in Academic Affairs. 
-There is a need to get students optimistic about advising and not just course selection.
-First year advising experience needs to be revised.  After 2 hours of testing, students were exposed to 2 hours of a PowerPoint presentation regarding advising without a break.
-How is advising defined across the disciplines?
-The possibility of faculty pitching in at the Advising Center in G217.

Other:  April 8th is the date for the Grandchamp lecture TBA.

Meeting Adjourned:  4:21 pm
Respectfully submitted, Ginny Leeman, BCC Faculty and Professional Staff Active VP