Shifting Reporting Lines for the Dean of Advisement
A proposal has been made to have the Dean of Advisement report to the Office of Academic Affairs, rather than to the Office of Enrollment Services, as is currently the case. Please feel free to offer your commentary on this matter.
Welcome to the Blog of the Faculty and Professional Staff Senate at Bristol Community College
Wednesday, February 18, 2015
Wednesday, November 12, 2014
Minutes of October 6, 2014
Bristol Community
College
Faculty &
Professional Staff Senate Meeting
Minutes of Monday October
6, 2014
B101 3:15 p.m.
Senators
in attendance: E. French, R. Worthington, G. Heaney, S. Pero, D. St. George, J.
Duponte, J. Constantine, J. Corven, S. McCourt, J. Pelletier, J. Boulay, G.
Leeman, R. Benya-Soderbom, L. Delano-Botelho, R. Amarasingham, J. Mbugua, S.
Ferreira C. Poore-Pariseau, M. Geary, T Grady
Excused
Absences: H. Tinberg, S. Gabb, C. Leonard, M. Williams, K. Hiller
Absences:
R. Santos, D. Warr
Four
guests attended this meeting.
Special
Guests: TASC Director Ron Weisberger and Writing Center Director Genie Giaimo
Meeting called to order 3:18
pm.
Minutes: Minutes from September 14, 2014 were reviewed and
passed with amendments for small editing items and the addition of Senators R.
Worthington and T. Grady to the “attending” roster.
Writing Center &
TASC:
§ Ron Weisberger
provided an overview of the formation of the Learning Commons, where TASC and
the Writing Center share a physical space. He also highlighted how these areas are
also sharing the TutorTrac data management system despite maintaining separate
identities.
§ Genie Giaimo fielded
questions and provided clarifications regarding changes to the Writing Center.
o
She
indicated that drop-in students will not be turned away, but they will only be
served if accommodations are available at the time. The Center is shifting
toward scheduling appointments to increase usage rates for budgetary reasons,
but may create a waiting list for cancellations.
o
She
also indicated that there were no plans to phase out faculty tutors despite
adding peer tutors; she is also exploring adding tutor bios to the website. Her
hope is to expand services in the area of faculty research.
o
Her
goal is to work collaboratively to meet needs of faculty from different
disciplines and to better integrate Writing Center services in assignments. This
may include workshops on writing in disciplines and coordination with library
as a team for citations and research, argumentation and development.
§ A discussion followed
about the potential of implementing a joint document for assignments using the
Writing Center; this could include a brief student post-survey regarding goals
and outcomes, thereby allowing the student to internalize why he/she is using
the Center. She underscored the importance of using the Writing Center in a
manner that is meaningful for students. Director Giaimo offered to meet with
the Senate at a future date.
Division Updates:
· Division 1: Two Senators from Division 1 and one from
Division 4 attended the first PLA meeting;
now one coordinator will assess student portfolios, although there will be
options for individual departments; instructional student portfolio workshops
will be offered. Additionally, English portfolio assessments will incorporate
MapWorks for students who failed portfolio assessment; faculty are encouraged
to contact Dana Behuniak for training in MapWorks.
· Division 2: Search committee for new dean is meeting next
week to begin the new interviews.
· Division 3: No updates.
· Division 4: No updates.
· Division 5: New Associate Dean of STEM Meghan Abella-Bowen
met with Division 5 faculty regarding the new TAACCCT 4 grant.
· Division 6: No updates.
· Division 7:
o
Office of Disability Services: Each building will have demonstrations of the evacuation
chairs and ODS received approval for a full-time deaf/hard of hearing
coordinator.
o
Lash Division: The college was
awarded a Department of Labor TAACCCT 4 grant for STEM GPS in General Studies
in the amount of $525,000 over 4 years and Lash CTL is piloting a year-long hybrid
Adjunct Certificate Program.
o
Enrollment &
Student Services:
Enrollment is down 1.6% but student retention and graduation rates increased; the
call center made 6,000 phone calls to students and applicants; Marianne
LeGuyader is the new Assistant Director of Student Life; Vice President Leeman
and Athletic Director Derek Viveiros worked on a new CSS course for student
athletes.
Division/Area Grant
Wish List
President
McCourt proposed a new grant wish list form that any group on campus may
initiate. The proposed form would include name of the contact person and
acknowledgement that he/she is willing to participate in writing and/or
assessment of the grant. President McCourt will provide a draft to Senators for
next meeting.
Bylaws and
Reorganization:
Due
to the reorganization of divisions 6 and 7, Senate bylaws will need to be
revised; President McCourt will meet with Senators Leeman, Boulay and
Worthington to explore.
Annual Goals and
Calendar:
President
McCourt distributed tentative topics and goals for the current academic year; further
discussion regarding additions/revisions is scheduled for later meeting.
Subsequent meetings will incorporate updates on:
1.
Shared
governance
2.
Communication
and representation
3.
Excellence,
equity and inclusion
The
green schedule will also be revisited and may be added to the annual goals.
Joint
Senate/Administration Closed-Loop Governance Initiative:
President
McCourt received notification from AVP of Academic Affairs Ucci that President
Sbrega signed the joint initiative; however, upon comparison with the latest
iteration sent in the spring, it was determined that there were significant differences
from said document. While the Senate would receive notification of new
initiatives, concerns were raised regarding the feedback and evaluation process
for pilot initiatives. The Senate unanimously agreed to have a full discussion
before providing official comment.
Meeting adjourned 4:16 p.m.
Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Boulay, BCC
Faculty & Professional Staff Secretary
Monday, October 6, 2014
Minutes of September 15, 2014
Bristol Community
College
Faculty &
Professional Staff Senate Meeting
Minutes of Monday September15,
2014
H210 3:15 p.m.
Senators
in attendance: E. French, R. Worthington, G. Heaney, C. Leonard, S. Pero, D.
St. George, J. Duponte, J. Constantine, J. Corven, S. McCourt, J. Pelletier, J.
Boulay, G. Leeman, R. Soderbom, L. Delano-Botelho, R. Amarasingham, J. Mbugua,
K. Hiller, M. Williams, S. Ferreira, J. Jodoin Krauzyk (for C. Poore-Pariseau),
M. Geary, T. Grady
Excused
Absences: H. Tinberg, S. Gabb
Absences:
R. Santos, D. Warr
Eight
guests attended this meeting.
Meeting called to order 3:16 pm.
Minutes: Minutes from May 5, 2014 voted on
and accepted.
Division Updates:
· Division 1: Concerns were raised regarding policy changes
at the Writing Center, the absence of faculty engagement in these changes and
the impact these changes would have on student success. Dean Preston is working
with the Office of Disability Services and Human Relations regarding
accessibility for a new faculty member who is deaf.
· Division 2: The search for a division dean has been
extended; the search will include the same committee members from the summer.
· Division 3: The division is offering a third annual “boot
camp” (accelerated college success strategy in one day).
· Division 4: A new associate dean had been hired and is
primarily stationed in New Bedford. A new full-time fieldwork coordinator in
the occupational therapy assistant program and a new full-time faculty member
in healthcare information were also hired. Programs are up for
re-accreditation.
· Division 5: Seeds of Sustainability is urging the college
to explore fossil fuel divestment.
· Division 6: No update.
· Division 7: The Senate Bylaws will need to be changed to
reflect the new Lash Division organization. First-year advising has reached 60-70%
and the college is in the process of hiring a new advisor. The Office of
Disability Services accessibility task force is exploring website captioning;
they intend to collaborate with the Learning Resources Center.
Writing Center &
TASC:
President
McCourt spoke individually with the directors of the Writing Center and TASC;
both could not attend the Senate meeting due to a scheduling conflict, but they
agreed to attend the October meeting. A discussion followed regarding concerns
over online and face-to-face hours and the implication of shared governance in
the policy changes at the Writing Center.
Joint
Senate/Administration Closed-Loop Governance Initiative:
President
McCourt spoke with Vice Presidents Sethares and Ucci regarding the shared
governance initiative; she will follow-up with them within a week for a status
update.
Vice Presidents Council
Meetings:
The
Senate has been invited to attend the “deans only” VPC meetings, as opposed to
the full meetings, which occur Tuesday afternoons. President McCourt will
provide the schedule to Senators.
Annual Goals and
Calendar:
A
tentative calendar was discussed, as follows:
· October: Writing
Center, Academic Support, Service-Learning and Vision Project, communication
with other campuses & center (invite chairs of Central Committee)
· November: Writing
Center, NEASC Report; revise bylaws in light of divisional changes and omit Senate
interest groups
· December: shared
governance in grants at the college, strategic planning involving stakeholders
(wish list by divisions) to extend involvement; advisement update with Dean Steven
Viveiros
· January: transition,
Quest, Vision, PARCC
Other Items/Reminders:
· Search committees: Concerns were raised for the search committee
task force regarding Division 1 searches (e.g., candidates alerted late,
committee size, use of resources, reconstituted searches). An audit was
recommended to explore the timeline for when the position posted, committee
convenes, candidates have second interview and candidates are notified of their
status.
· Scheduling: Senate inquired about an update on the scheduling
student survey.
· Website: Senators expressed interest in how to report
feedback on new website and inquired about the methods for continuous
improvement.
· PLA Task Force: Senators Amarasingham and Geary have joined
the Prior Learning Assessment task force; the group will meet in December.
· Blackboard LMS: Senators expressed interest in inviting Dean
Bellafiore for an update on the Blackboard Learning Management System.
· Campus Representation: Senate will explore how to improve
representation from other campuses, including how the Senate can be used as an
academic tool to support academic work there.
· Diversity: The Senate will explore a common definition
for diversity at BCC. The Office of Disability Services suggested incorporating
Universal Design for Learning strategies in classroom to retain students, as
well as for leveraging support for support services through grants.
Meeting adjourned 4:13 p.m.
Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Boulay, BCC
Faculty & Professional Staff Secretary
Wednesday, October 1, 2014
Minutes of May 5, 2014
Bristol Community
College
Faculty &
Professional Staff Senate Meeting
Minutes of Monday May 5,
2014
B101 3:15 p.m.
Senators
in attendance: E. French, T. Grady, J. Grandchamp, S. Lygren, H. Tinberg, A.
Rolfe, R. Worthington, G. Heaney, C. Leonard, S. Pero D. St. George, R. Clark
(substituting was K. Garganta), J. Duponte, J. Constantine, J. Corven, S.
McCourt, J. Pelletier, K. Woldegiorgis, J. Myles, R. Weisberger, J. Boulay, C.
Poore-Pariseau
Excused
Absences: Sil Ferreira, Paul Robillard, JP Nadeau, M. Williams, S. Gabb
Absences:
T. McGarty, D. Warr
Three
guests.
Special
guests Professor Debra Anderson, English, Division I; and Dean of advisement
Steven Viveiros.
Meeting called to order 3:19
Minutes from April 7 2014 voted on
and accepted with emendation: Jean Myles
was present. One abstention.
Meeting
began with a brief update: due to the
NEASC team visit, Senate elections were delayed and will begin online tonight;
following results of these general elections, the Senate officers election will
be held next week. As per last elections, these will be accomplished using a secure
survey tool. Constituents will receive a secure link via email; survey will
include a space for write-ins.
Prior Learning Discussion:
The
Senate’s first guest, Professor Debra Anderson offered some background on the
changes to PEL. The college is retooling PEL, which will now be called “PLA—Prior
Learning Assessment.” (PEL/PLA is a concept long-accepted at BCC and nationwide
that allows students to obtain credit for life experiences.) At BCC, this
program was once very decentralized and departments would handle their own
granting of credits for prior life experience. Military training etc. would be provided
credit by national guidelines or by individual BCC department guidelines,
whichever appropriate. Often there would be department exams or credit by
portfolio. Professor Anderson has been asked to help centralize this process,
and she indicated that this has proven more time-consuming than she had first
anticipated. In effect, a person
assessing outside work for credit receives a new set of information with each student applicant to PLA.
Currently, there is no clear process to follow and we need this and faculty compensation
is inconsistent and the manual needs updating. Prof. Anderson is trying to get
an ad hoc group together, including representation from the Senate, workforce
development, MCCC, Student Services, administration, and the Grants area.
(Debra’s position is funded by a grant.) Prof. Anderson wondered if there are
there any other recommendations for membership for this ad hoc group to insure
all constituencies concerned are considered. Members of the Senate asked her to
add one or more program coordinators and a transfer person. Someone to think of
long-term impacts would also be a good addition to the group. Another
suggestion was a person who has been active in Distance Ed. Among the questions
raised by Senate members: will we look at testing out of the college’s technical
literacy requirement—perhaps a challenge exam based on outcomes outlined in the
BCC requirements for demonstrated
technical literacy? Senators were asked to email Debra Anderson with
questions or issues or if interested in serving with this ad hoc group.
Advisement Center
Discussion: Dean
Steven Viveiros joined the Senate to offer an update on the implementation of
recommendations made by the Joint Administration/Senate Committee. With him, he
brought an updated document (see second attachment) and indicated that the implementation
group had met once in fall 2013 and once in spring 2014. Dean Viveiros decided
to tackle what would impact students directly first, postponing some of the
faculty-related pieces. He expressed his
concern that he hadn’t had a year to learn about BCC before the expectation
that he would jump right in to implementing the recommendations. First up was
the institution of a first year advising program. (See first attachment.) The first
workshop contact affords students career assessment, a look at their goals...do
these line up with the program in which they are enrolled? They also learn to
use catalog and make class decisions on their own own, with one-to-one help,
are advised to enroll in learning communities and combo English 091/092
classes, etc. They also select other basic/gen ed, first semester courses. They
are then registered for their first semester. Three more meetings occur in their
first semester. In the first of these three meetings, GPA calculation, reading the
catalog accurately, preparing for advisement, using map works, etc., are
accomplished. Students also do a self-inventory survey regarding the effort and
hours put into their work at BCC. The plan is ultimately to get this Mapworks
self-inventory survey to faculty too and let faculty give input to students
through this page on Mapworks. Those at risk and self-reported or reported as
such by faculty will be brought into The Student Success Center (B120) for
extra coaching. In the next workshop students are taught to use Degreeworks to
develop a plan based on their programs and ultimately to have something solid
in the way of semester planning to show to their advisors. The third workshop
involves picking courses by time and campus based on the students’ plans made
in the previous workshop. The goal is to
get students in to see their advisors WITH a plan for the next semester and
courses picked so that advisors can use the time to check the plan, then talk
with their advisees about long-range plans, success of the current semester,
etc.
In
semester two, freshmen will have a choice of a career or a transfer workshop. A second workshop will help them update their
academic plans and get ready for priority registration. There is a rolling
model, so students enrolling in Fall or Spring can get the first year workshops
in either semester. There are distance elearning workshops online. These are
used for elearning students but also in cases where on-campus students can't
attend in person. Dean Viveiros sees ways for Advisement to partner with CSS
instructors and is working on that now.
Each
freshman advising workshop has an active
activity; students directly from high school will likely expect this. Older
students often say they know this workshop material and ask if there is a
challenge exam for the workshops. Steve is concerned that students don't
realize how much they don't know about college.
Currently, the Advisement area only eliminates those who have been in
college here or elsewhere before. Dean
Viveiros indicated that he would personally like to speak with students who
don't feel they need the advisement workshops. Students now coming in learn
about all of the workshops, though when they were first instituted last
semester students didn’t always know these workshops were required. Next year, Dean
Viveiros plans to partner with faculty and improve advisement by building professional
development for faculty by
faculty. Steve Viveiros’s extension is
2871 and his email is steven.viveiros@britolcc.edu . He requested that Senators with further
questions or suggestions contact him directly.
Update/Questions Joint
Senate/Administration Closed-Loop Governance Initiative: The question arose
about grants and whether proposed grants will be part of the shared governance policy/procedure.
The answer: yes. The following were discussed on the Senate floor as
appropriate for all academic proposals going through the policy/process: 1)
proposals should come through the Academic Vice President and Senate President;
2) there should be initial notification of the Senate and the entire college;
3) when the initiative has been through the process set in the policy, signatures should be limited to the Academic
Vice President and the College President, and it should be strongly suggested
that a Senate response be included. It was also discussed that 4) a new
committee be formed for insuring continued assessment/evaluation of the
policy/process for shared academic governance. A motion was then made from the
Senate floor that the proposed process be implemented, with these four changes (1-4 above) inserted. Motion passed.
Further
discussion brought out the suggestion that we not pick one thing to test this
policy/procedure, but that instead we begin to use it with every academic
proposal, then evaluate the process again and again as we go along.
It
was also mentioned that the college must get to a set kind of “dashboard” approach
to apply to all projects going through the process, for the sake of
consistency, fairness and clarity of process.
A
request was made that the new associate Vice President be met with by the executive
committee before summer in order that she might be brought up to date on joint
Senate and Administrative initiatives.
Meeting adjourned 4:10 p.m.
respectfully submitted, Jeanne P. Grandchamp,
BCC Faculty & Professional Staff Secretary
FOLLOWING ARE DOCUMENTS SUPPLIED BY DEAN STEVEN
VIVEIROS…
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







