Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Minutes of October 26, 2015

Bristol Community College
Faculty & Professional Staff Senate Meeting
Minutes of Monday, October 26, 2015
Room B101 3:15pm

Senators in attendance:  M. Geary, J. Flanigan, S. Pero, H. Tinberg, R. Worthington, R. Benya-Soderbom, J. Boulay, K. Hiller, B. French, L. Neubert, S. McCourt, J. Corven, J. Jodoin, L. Delano-Botelho, J. Pelletier, S. Ferreira, R. Amarasingham
Absences: T. Grady, J. Constantine, D. Phillips, C. Leonard
Excused Absences: G. Leeman, D. St. George, J. Mbugua
Special Guest: Deb Cohen
Six guests attended this meeting.
Meeting called to order:  3:20 pm, quorum 3:39
Minutes:  Minutes from October 5th were reviewed and approved with no abstentions.
Advisement Matters
Dean of Advising, Deb Cohen, discussed what Advising is currently implementing:
·         The dissemination of the Mapworks survey through CSS courses
·         Academic advisors are now connected to each of the academic divisions (including Lash and Workforce)
o    Goal: Gain a better understanding of student needs within division
·         Advising 101, 102, 103 sessions focus—how to be a successful student (ongoing)
·         Appointment Plus program (online software package; started last year), with a possibility of extending to faculty in the future
o    Will assess how things work this semester
·         Assembling advising task force to explore online advising
·         Updating website for academic advising
·         Weekly submissions to Bristol Buzz by advisors
·         Orientation has now moved to Advising; drawing from some aspects from Division 3 boot camp
·         First annual majors fair to be held February 2nd
Division Reports
·         There were no updates from any of the divisions.
Rolling Out the New Academic Initiative Implementation Guidelines: General Education Competency Review
Task force co-chairs, Secretary Boulay and Holly Pappas, provided an update on the status of the new academic initiative implementation guideline for the general education competency review. They offered a recap of the revisions to the Academic Initiative document (e.g., timeline, communication plan, relevant NEASC standard). President Tinberg will sign this document after minor changes are made (i.e., moving timeline and communication plan to the appendix).
Update on Academic Support and Retention Task Force Charge
President Sbrega sent an email calling for joint task force on student retention. Originally, this task force was to be Senate-run, with a focus on the allocation of resources for academic support to students. The Senate then discussed the benefits and challenges of collaborating with the administration during the initial stages of this initiative. The Senate’s goal is to focus on retention at the intersection of academics across campuses. The following questions were raised by Senate members:
·         How is academic support being defined? Allow committee to decide working definition
·         Could this be part of a larger joint effort?
·         Who is on the existing retention council? Is the process transparent?
·         How willing are students to use academic support?
·         What will be the methodology for work?
·         What do we know? What do we need to know?
·         What do students need that we are not providing?
·         Are there existing services that a student needs beyond academic support?
A motion was passed by the Senate to accept the offer to begin collaborative work with the administration in spring 2016; however, they reserve the right to gather data that it hopes will inform the Senate’s efforts as a serious partner in such collaboration.
General Studies and the Meta-Major
Tabled for next Senate meeting.
Other

Meeting Adjourned:  4:16 pm
Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Boulay, BCC Faculty & Professional Staff Secretary



Minutes of October 5, 2015

Bristol Community College
Faculty & Professional Staff Senate Meeting
Minutes of Monday, October 5, 2015
Room B101 3:15pm

Senators in attendance:  M. Geary, J. Pelletier, R. Benya-Soderbom, D. St. George, S. Pero, R. Worthington, S. McCourt, J. Boulay, J. Flanigan, L. Neubert, H. Tinberg, R. Amarasingham, T. Grady, L. Delano-Botelho, J. Corven, B. French, J. Constantine, D. Phillips, J. Jodoin
Absences: C. Leonard, J. Mbugua, S. Ferreira
Excused Absences: G. Leeman, K. Hiller
Four guests attended this meeting.
Meeting called to order:  3:19 pm
Minutes:  Minutes from September 21st were reviewed and approved with no abstentions, with correction to date of meeting.
Division Reports
·         Division 1: An English department initiative is looking at incoming students’ PARCC results for reading and writing placement instead of relying on Accuplacer with an expected decision in December 2015. Questions were raised over how the creation of metamajors would impact the Commonwealth Honors Program and other similar programs and how Division I might be involved in the process of creating an English major.
·         Division 2: No updates
·         Division 3: No updates
·         Division 4: No updates
·         Division 5: No updates
·         Division 6: No updates
·         Other Divisions: The Disability Concerns Committee is looking how to reshape its mission to become a beacon for awareness. They will explore policies and funding and are looking at accessibility as a shared responsibility.
Discussion and Vote on By-Laws
Revisions to the Senate By-Laws were passed with one amendment to include Advising as a separate academic division, without abstention. Senators Boulay, Leeman, and Worthington were thanked for their work on this subcommittee. The adopted By-Laws will be posted on the Senate blog and changes are as follows:
·         In light of the College’s reorganization of academic areas and after conducting a census of constituents, “Division VII” (which previously consisted of any representation outside of Divisions I-VI) has been retired. Academic divisions now include divisions I, II, III, IV, V, VI, Lash, Advising, Enrollment Services, and Student Services.
·         Electronic voting has been approved for Senate meetings in the event that “a quorum of senators is not present, or if a quorum approves, an electronic vote may be conducted.”
·         A Nominations Committee has been added as a standing committee for the Senate.
Rolling Out the New Academic Initiative Implementation Guidelines: General Education Competency Review
Task force co-chairs, Secretary Boulay and Holly Pappas, provided an update on the status of the new academic initiative implementation guideline for the general education competency review. After reading the description of the project, the following discussions and questions arose:
·         There was confusion over the terms and charge of the initiative (e.g., competencies vs. requirements).
·         There was an expressed interest in the broader timeline of the project, especially if this initiative is a smaller piece of outcomes assessment in response to NEASC.
·         What is the correlation between competencies and course offerings? How will this impact courses?
·         What impact will outcomes assessment measures and results have on faculty evaluations? How will they be used?
Senate recommendations are as follows:
·         Further define intended audience (e.g., faculty, students, both), purpose, charge, and include glossary of terms.
·         Diagram overall timeline for next committee meeting (e.g., how this relates to NEASC response).
·         Bring revised language with additional clarification of charge and timeline to next Senate meeting for signature.
·         Share document with constituents and include Student Services as part of “academic area.”
Update on Academic Support and Retention Task Force
Charge
The committee will gather data on the funding and utilization of academic support (academic tutoring and advisement) across campuses and will explore the impact these resources have on student retention. The committee will submit a written report with findings and clear recommendations.
·         April 11: Preliminary report submitted to Senate at its April meeting
·         May1: Final report submitted to the Senate President
President Tinberg discussed the need for Senators and constituents to serve on this group. Interested Senators should contact President Tinberg to join the committee.
·         Senators discussed additional considerations:
o    possible impact work-to-rule might have on this initiative
o    delivering academic support despite physical space limitations at different campuses
o    defining terms of academic support vs. keeping it broadly defined for the committee
o    allocation of resources vs. funding
o    collection of valid data (e.g., are numbers truly captured by overburdened areas given reporting time constraints)

Meeting Adjourned:  4:18 pm

Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Boulay, BCC Faculty & Professional Staff Secretary

Wednesday, October 7, 2015

By-Laws for Bristol Community College Faculty and Professional Staff Senate

ARTICLE I:  MISSION, FUNCTIONS & MEMBERSHIP

Mission

The name of the organization is the Bristol Community College Faculty and Professional Staff Senate.  Its purpose will be to provide a deliberative body designed to promote shared governance, transparency, collegiality, and mutual trust among faculty and staff and administration.  Further, the Faculty and Professional Staff Senate will provide a forum to enhance academic values and opportunities.

Functions

     To advocate for all Faculty and Professional Staff regarding matters outside of the collective bargaining agreement.  Areas include but need not be limited to the following:
     Curriculum
     Academic Standards
     Degree and certificate completion
     Assessment
     Planning
     Professional Development
     Accreditation
     Utilization of resources
     To provide a liaison between Senate constituents and administration
     To share in college-wide decision making     
     To participate in the formulation and implementation of policy directly impacting Senate constituents
     To promote an open and honest community marked by freedom of expression for all at the college
     To act as a single, representative voice expressing constituent views in college-wide discussions

Membership

Any employee of Bristol Community College whose primary employment (more than 75 percent of assigned hours) is as a faculty or professional staff member is a “constituent.”

ARTICLE II:  GOVERNANCE

The Senate shall be comprised of Senators elected from the constituent bodies from the Academic Divisions of the College:  I, II, III, IV, V, VI, Lash Division, Advising, Enrollment Services, and Student Services.

The Senate shall have an Executive Committee comprised of the Senate officers.

Senators

Eligibility

By virtue of their membership in the Faculty and Professional Staff Senate’s constituent groups, a person is eligible to be nominated or to self-nominate and run for election to the Senate.

Nominations and Elections

The Executive Committee will receive names of nominees from the constituent groups and present the nominees for election to the constituent groups.  All nominations are due by March 2.

Voting

For election of Senators, all members (all full-time and all part-time faculty and professional staff as defined under “Membership,” above) will be eligible to vote.

Number of Senators

The number of Senators from each division will be 15 percent (or 20 percent) of the total number of its constituents, with the following provisos:
     Total number of constituents will be based on the number of full-time faculty and professional staff in the census, which will be conducted every three years.
     For Divisions 1-5: if the number of Senators from any of these divisions is below “3,” then that division will have 3 Senators; if it is above “6,” then that division will have 6 Senators. For Division 6, Advising, Lash Division, Enrollment Services, and Student Services: if the number of Senators is below “1,” then that division will have 1 Senator; if it is above “4,” then that division will have 4 Senators.
     A majority of the number of Senators from each division will be full-time faculty and professional staff.  If a division has 3 Senators, then 2 of the 3 Senators will be full-time constituents; if 4 Senators, 3 of the 4 will be full-time; if 5 Senators, then 3 of the 5 will be full-time; if 6 Senators, then 4 of the 6 will be full-time.
     If there are not enough full- or part-time constituents to fill a division’s nominating slots for Senators, then the vacant slots can be filled by any combination of full- and part-time constituents.  This is designed to facilitate full representation.


Length of Service

A senator will be elected to one two-year term with the possibility of election to a second two-year term; that is, two consecutive two-year terms may be served.

In the event a Senator does not fulfill their term, the Senator elected will complete that term. This one year will not be considered a full term; that is, the Senator may now choose to continue for two full terms.

Following a one-term (two-year) break, a Senate constituent member may re-apply for nomination for election to the senate.  In the event that a Division does not have a candidate to replace a Senator who has completed two consecutive terms, the  Executive Committee can recommend the Division’s serving Senator for consideration by his/her Division as a candidate for office to represent that Division.

Mechanism of Election

A closed-ballot vote will be held on or about April second.

Each constituent in each division will be eligible to vote for the appropriate number of senators within his/her division during a period designated as election period.

Constituents who work in more than one division may request to vote in one of those divisions. They will vote in only one division.

Officers

The officers of the Senate shall be a President, Vice President, and Secretary.  The officers of the Senate shall constitute an Executive Committee.

Officers must be elected senators. Candidates are nominated by constituents.  Candidates will be elected by a simple majority of all constituents voting.

Terms of Senate Officers

Terms of office shall be two years.  Officers may serve no more than two consecutive two-year terms.  A member may serve again after being out of office for one term.

Senate Officer Vacancies and Leaves of Absence
An officer who is on leave or sabbatical from the college may choose to fulfill his/her Senate duties or to resign.

Any necessary replacements will be appointed by the Executive Committee. Acting as a temporary replacement will not count toward the two consecutive two-year terms that an officer can serve before leaving office.

Duties of Senate Officers

The President shall:

1.    Preside at all the regular and special Senate meetings.
2.    Communicate for the Senate with the college President and administration.
3.    Determine the agenda for all meetings in advance along with the Executive Committee. Represent the Senate at various College functions.
4.    Provide orientation for new Senators.
5.    Charge and appoint members to the Nominations Committee.

The Vice President shall:

1.  Perform the duties of the President in his/her absence.
2.  Perform other duties as assigned by the President.
3.  Succeed the President in the event that he/she is unable to serve out his/her term.

The Secretary shall:

1.    Issue reminders of Senate meetings to Senators and Senate constituencies; when necessary, notify the Senate constituencies of special meetings or special votes, including proposed and ratified amendments to these By-Laws.
2.    Keep the minutes of all meetings of the Executive Committee and the Senate and distribute said minutes to Senate constituencies.
3.    Record a list of members present at each meeting of the Senate.
4.    Aid the President and Vice President with other information dissemination and record keeping as may become necessary.
 
ARTICLE III:  STANDING AND AD HOC COMMITTEES

Nominations Committee

Charge
Working closely with the Secretary of the Senate, the Nominating Committee will prepare  a slate of candidates for the Senate and for Senate Officers no later than March 2nd  each year, delivering that slate to the President of the Senate by that time.  In preparing a slate of candidates, the Committee will make every effort to include representation from all campuses.

Members
The Nominations Committee will be made up of four members, two of whom will be former senators and two current senators.  Members will be appointed by the President of the Senate, who will also choose the Committee chair.

Terms
Committee members will serve a term of two years, with the possibility of one additional term, with the Senate President’s approval.

Ad Hoc Committees

In addition, the Senate may vote to form ad hoc committees for limited terms. All ad hoc committees will be constituted for the length of one-year.    Committee charges will be reconsidered at a September meeting of the Senate, at which time the Senate will vote to continue or end their work.

Process for Amendment of By-Laws

The By-Laws will be voted on once per year in the Fall semester. In addition, the By-Laws can be amended according to the following process.

1.    During any regular or special meeting, a constituent or a senator may propose in writing an emendation to these By-Laws.
2.    The proposed amendment will be directed to the Officers and other relevant Interest groups for consideration.
3.    The secretary will distribute the text of the amendment to constituents for review.
4.    At the next Senate meeting which is at least four weeks after the proposed amendment, the Senate will discuss the amendment. It is only after this waiting period and discussion that a vote can be taken.
5.    Following the debate, a closed-ballot vote will be taken of all present.  A properly annotated proxy vote will be acceptable during this closed-ballot vote.
6.    An amendment must be approved by a two-thirds vote of the Senate.

ARTICLE IV:  MEETINGS


The Executive Committee and the Senate shall each meet monthly during the academic year.

Special meetings will be called as needed.

Process for Conducting All Meetings                  
The Faculty and Professional Staff Senate promotes collegial discussion and debate; it encourages members and visitors to speak openly, listen actively and respect the confidentiality of those willing to share their opinions.  To minimize the need to time the comments or questions of the discussants, the Senate requests that members and visitors self-monitor.  The Senate is dedicated to working actively to achieve results.

1.    The presiding officer will call the meeting to order.
2.    A majority of Senators (more than 50%) from four of the seven divisions plus two of the three officers will be necessary for a QUORUM during regular or special Senate meetings. 
3.    An agenda and minutes of the previous meeting will be distributed in advance of the meeting. Discussion will follow the set agenda unless agreed by Senators present at the meeting. The presiding officer will recognize individual members and constituents to speak on topic. Motions will be voted on and ratified or denied by voice vote or closed ballot, as appropriate.

Voting

A majority of Senators (one more than 50 percent of the total number of Senators present) carry the motion.

If a quorum of senators is not present, or if a quorum approves, an electronic vote may be conducted.  As with face-to-face voting, a majority of Senators (at least 51 percent) carries the motion in electronic tabulation.

Attendance
It is expected that elected BCC Senators shall attend all senate meetings, whether regular or specially called.  In the event that an absence cannot be avoided, a Senator will designate a member of his/her Division as a substitute; if this is not possible, said Senator will contact the Senate Secretary and the absence will be declared an “excused absence.”  Should a Senator accrue two unexcused absences in a single academic year, the Secretary will notify the Executive Committee which may appoint a temporary replacement from the affected division; this temporary replacement will serve the remainder of the term.

Executive Session
Executive Sessions will be called based on the sensitivity of an issue.  An Executive Session may be called when the Executive Committee (by a majority vote) deems a particular matter to be of a sensitivity that demands an Executive Session.

Special Meetings

A Special Meeting may be called when the Executive Committee (by a majority vote) deems a particular matter to be of importance to the members of the Faculty and Professional Staff Senate.

The purpose of the Special Meeting will be for examination of a particular issue or concern that is being considered at the college, the examination of which cannot wait until the next regularly scheduled Senate meeting.


GLOSSARY
“Constituent,” as noted in this document, will hereafter be any employee of Bristol Community College whose primary employment (more than 75 percent of assigned hours) is as a faculty or professional staff member.

“Divisions,” as noted in this document, will hereafter be the Bristol Community College Academic Division:  I, II, III, IV, V, VI, Lash Division, Advising, Enrollment Services, and Student Services.

 “Non-Represented Groups” will refer to those groups invited to designate and send a liaison to regularly scheduled Senate meetings.  These groups will include but will not necessarily be limited to administration, AFSCME, student government, and non-unit personnel.

“Proxy ballot,” as noted in this document, will hereafter denote an official form devised by the Executive Committee to record the vote of a constituent who is unable to attend a meeting.  A proxy ballot might contain either permission for a present constituent to vote in place of an absent one or a statement of how the absent constituent would vote if present.

“Senators,” as noted in this document, will hereafter be the term used to designate those representing the Senate’s constituent groups.


Approved October 5, 2015

Tuesday, October 6, 2015

Minutes of September 21, 2015

Bristol Community College
Faculty & Professional Staff Senate Meeting
Minutes of Monday, September 21, 2015
Room H129 3:15pm

Senators in attendance:  M. Geary, J. Pelletier, R. Benya-Soderbom, D. St. George, S. Pero, R. Worthington, S. McCourt, J. Boulay, S. Ferreira, J. Flanigan, L. Neubert, H. Tinberg, R. Amarasingham, K. Hiller, T. Grady, L. Delano-Botelho, J. Corven, B. French
Absences: C. Leonard, J. Mbugua, J. Constantine, D. Phillips, J. Jodoin
Excused Absences: G. Leeman
Four guests attended this meeting.
Meeting called to order:  3:16 pm
Minutes:  Minutes from September 3rd were reviewed and approved with no abstentions.
Division Reports
·         Division 1: Getting to know new dean; large division; rumors of reorganization
·         Division 2: Getting to know new dean; eye on gen ed task force
·         Division 3: No updates
·         Division 4: looking for healthcare info management program director and instructor, dental hygiene working on self-study due in fall; clinical lab science is having accreditation visit
·         Division 5: discussion of new academic programs to BHE (e.g., life sciences); middle school visit; increase undergraduate research opportunities; planetarium programs; accessibility of services at other campuses
·         Division 6: No updates
·         Other Divisions: No updates
Senate’s Strategic Goals for AY 2015-2016
The strategic goals for the academic year 2015-2016 were reviewed and approved with no abstentions by the Senate.
·         Governance:
o    Senate President Tinberg and Secretary Boulay have begun meeting with BCC President Sbrega and Chief Academic Officer Sethares on a monthly basis.
o    The Executive Committee has been invited to attend the full Vice President Council (VPC) meetings.
o    The General Education Task Force will utilize the Academic Initiative joint governance document (the form may also be used for a new Title III grant to foster inclusion from all sectors).
o    The Senate will vote on changes to by-laws and provide input to NEASC groups.
·         Sustainability:
o    A nominations committee will be formed and new Senators will be mentored.
o    A question was raised whether Senate membership satisfies committee membership (like MACER does).
§  Division 4 treats Senate membership as fulfilling committee work and Senators have the opportunity for monthly reporting at division meetings (visibility and inclusiveness of governance).
§  Senators noted the importance of preserving independence and some concerns were raised over being viewed as a committee for college service.
·         Student retention & support:
o    An ad hoc task force with clear timeline will be formed, consisting of Senators and constituents. They will be charged with creating a data report on student retention and support to be shared with college.
o    A spring summit on academic support and retention will also be planned.
General Education Competencies
·         The task force will hold their first meeting on September 24, 2015; they will discuss the charge, established timeline, and committee makeup.
·         Five Senators are represented on the 17 member group and Secretary Boulay will co-chair it with Holly Pappas.
·         The Academic Initiative joint governance document will be piloted by the task force and information will be shared publicly.
·         A discussion followed regarding the importance of faculty-driven outcomes assessment; questions were raised about the impetus for creating this group and whether it was a reaction to NEASC.
NEASC Working Groups
Questions were raised about the status of the NEASC working groups.
·         Senators indicated that none of the working groups received notice of upcoming meetings for this academic year.
·         Senators on the governance group questioned whether they would oversee the new academic initiative process.
·         Senators on the outcomes assessment group weren’t sure whether their charge was fulfilled by making recommendations to form a general education task force.
·         The advising group met twice in spring, but are not sure how new dean advising will impact their charge; the meeting focus consisted of eliminating paperwork during advising and having students meet with the same advisor.
As a result, the Senate will request update on working groups’ charge, accomplishments, and status to send to constituents so it is clear to the entire college community.
Proposed Changes to By-Laws
·         Senate will vote on by-laws at next meeting; quorum is needed.
·         The Senate will explore electronic voting via Office 365 (Central Committee discussed requiring committees to submit electronic minutes to share with community).
·         An amendment will need to be added to the proposed by-laws to reflect representation of Advising in reorganization to Academic Affairs.
Other
·         Senators expressed concern over the number of full-time faculty positions that have not been replaced from last year and the limited office space for full-time faculty who are teaching at other campuses (e.g., New Bedford, Attleboro, Taunton).
·         A discussion about student and faculty equity followed: including the use of contingent labor, the impact of course cancellations due to low enrollment, the feasibility for students to complete programs of study at any BCC campus (e.g., integrity of programs and access to resources for satellite campuses) and how this information is communicated to students.

Meeting Adjourned:  4:16 pm
Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Boulay, BCC Faculty & Professional Staff Secretary